The music process of questions and answers can help in financial trading

Story and conversation with questions and answers as explained by Hans Zimmer can help the technical, financial trader.

Many traders have their trading ideas that help them win.

Such ideas, however, are not a panacea or substitute for all the hard work that goes into understanding how to trade the financial markets.

They are more to do with a traders discipline and a traders personal way of trend and context identification.

Hans Zimmer and answers

We like the thought process of the composer Hans Zimmer.

In composing his music, he says it can be summed up in one word – Story. For the financial trader, the story is the market cycle.

We apply his methodology in our trades. Conversation is context; question and answer notes are price action.

Below we have a series of ‘trade’ questions and answers. For us, the sequence of bars following the green arrows are the questions, and those within the red arrows are the answers.

We will trade a question but only from an entry bar and just as a scalp. Answers, however, can be taken from signal or entry bars as swings or scalps.

When does a question become an answer?

If the bull bar with the blue circle had closed above the resistance – the next price level that is determined by the bars about midway across the screen – this ‘blue circle’ bar might have premised into an answer.

Questions and answers are a price action.
Questions and answers are price action

We concluded that the blue circle bar would close low and remain a question. Therefore, we shorted the bar at about the centre of the blue circle.

Accurate enough, the answer bar came next and resulted in over 60 pips of profit in less than an hour.

Hans Zimmer’s explanation of Q and A in his music can similarly help a technical trader maintain the all-important market perspective on the chart.

Reactive or predictive in financial trading, what’s best?

Did our career ethos demand reactive or predictive decisions? What about financial trading?

It is right that most professions require predictive decision making. Engineers, doctors, entrepreneurs, lawyers, pilots.

Many of us from these disciplines have a go at financial trading in some form or other.

Why not apply the same predictive philosophy to trading that has always stood us in such good stead.

Mistake

Sorry, but that is mistake number one. To have any hope of success trading the financial markets, we need to change our career lessons of predictive bias to reactivity.

We all find this hard to do, it takes time to relearn, and most will never truly grasp the new concept.

We need to think of probability as the belief in an alternative outcome; it is not about the odds.

Highly probable trades are the essence of our (Slow Trader) strategy and paradoxically the most difficult to trade reactively.

Reactive, always

To do otherwise, to trade predictively rather than reactively, is to mistake possibilities for probabilities.

And knowing when not to trade is as important as knowing what trades are probably worth making.

Investor or speculator?

To be categorised as an investor or speculator can be made at all levels of finance.

Traditionally an investor is a long-term contributor to securities that have undergone a rigorous fundamental analytical process.

Shudder at the thought, the traditionalists consider, that a technical trade can be anything other than speculative.

But Mr Market can sometimes be nuttier than a fruitcake, and most financial decisions are bets if taken for less than 20 to 30 years. (Graham, The Intelligent Investor)

Controlling ourselves

Investing isn’t about beating others at their game. It’s about managing ourselves on our own. And as we are pattern seeking animals we technically convince ourselves of a particular market flow where one does not exist.

We know that if we speculate instead of invest, we lower our odds of building wealth and raise someones else’s.

An investment is not based on fundamental or technical detail per-say but is the safety of principle that attracts an adequate return. It is (1) analyse, (2) protect and (3) performance that is satisfactory, not extraordinary.

In other words, an investor calculates and a speculator gambles; regardless of whether it is based on technical or fundamental information or taken over a short or longish period. 

Online investor?

To that end, arguably online trading can be either depending on our approach. 

Remember the investor will analysis, protect and target. 

The speculator treats online financial trading as a way to mint money, a nonstop commercial video game. They busy themselves trading the low and medium probabilities.

The ‘investor’ of the online financial trades looks for high probability trades.

Screenshot 1, investor

In the screenshot below a high probability, entry presents itself at the green arrow. The target is 30 pips distant and the stop 60 pips. Would we hold if the trade went against us all the way to the stop? Probably not.

In any case, the stop distance makes sense. The doji bar soon after entry made us question the trade, but six hours later we achieved our high probability target.

An investors high probability trade.
Investors high probability trade

Screenshot 2, speculator

From the following day, our screenshot below provides a different picture. We considered this a high probability trade and entered long where indicated. We measured bar 2 for a measured move target.

Bar 3 was short of the goal. At the close of bar 3, we set to break even which we achieved. If we had not fortuitously done this, we would have exited with a loss at the close of bar 4.

It was only afterwards in debrief that we knew that this trade was speculation. The investors stop, having to be so distantly disproportionate to the target is a giveaway.

The investors (high probability) trade was short at the close of bar 5. In this trade stop and target were in proportion. 

Not an investors trade as stop too disproportionate to target.
Not an investors trade, as it turned out

Strategy and tactics are often confused by traders

Strategy and tactics, what’s the difference?

In the military fast jet world determining a clear strategy was the responsibility of the Generals. Throughout the Cold War period, most Western countries got it wrong.

Politics and industry drove strategy.

In the 70’s The United States Air Force (USAF) allowed a different approach. They put strategy above everything else. The outcome was the achievement of world air superiority, which they maintain to this day.

The USAF influence was from the “Fighter Mafia” and fighter pilot mavericks such as Colonel John Boyd. They realised the F15 and F16.

Colonel John Boyd, USAF fighter pilot, maverick and strategy.
Colonel John Boyd, USAF fighter pilot, maverick and strategy (ist)

A strategy is (almost) immovable. It is a principle on which to base all tactics.

As in warfare, a trader determines a strategy from which they can hang many tactics.

Most trading websites say strategies when they express tactics – “means by which a strategy is carried out”.

Low probability low risk

All beginners enter low probability trades. Reversals and trades that have a 40% or less chance of success.

We associate such trades with low risk which suits beginners that are frequently risk-averse. However, stops are often too close further reducing the probability.

Moreover, to counter the low probability when such a trade is successful the bet has to be held for a distant target to balance the strategy.

Medium probability medium risk

From an entry bar rather than a signal bar. However, an entry bar without good trade premise and thus a 50% probability. Traded by beginners and intermediate level traders.

High probability high risk

A trade that is (1) with a trend or (2) in the ‘probable direction’ from a significant break in a premise (3) or opposite in direction to an exhaustion bar.

Stops are distant which in turn provides high risk.

Can provide a 60% probability of success, better if we scale-in correctly. Almost exclusively traded by experts.

Our intraday trading strategy

“We take every HIGH PROBABILITY trade that fits market cycle, context and the economic calendar; we manage it procedurally whether the trade takes us in or out of the money, and a measured loss is acceptable”.

Conclusion

“Tactics are disposable. A strategy is for the long haul.” (Seth).

If high probability trades is our strategy, then everything else is tactics.

To Colonel, Boyd strategy was a compass, and tactics made the map.

Market cycle is more reliable the higher our time frame

Market cycle favours the higher time frame charts.

Why it’s easier to trade from a higher time frame chart?

A time frame is not a direct representation of decision time available. If we trade from a five-minute chart, we don’t have all five minutes to analyse and make a decision.

On such a chart we often have but a moment.

Mostly, however, we feel that ‘time’ to decide is what we gain from trading higher charts.

Another aspect of time and a higher chart, the daily for example, we need only look at a chart briefly but once a day.

Contrast that with a 5-minute chart where a trader looks at the chart all day long.

However, more important than the time available is the representative market cycle.

Take a look at the diagrams below to see the various market cycles, all screenshots taken within a moment of each other of sterling/dollar.

See how each time frame mostly projects a different cycle.

The higher the time frame traded, the more stable or more assured is the corresponding market cycle.

Traders work in larger or smaller market cycle microcosms the higher or lower the time frame chosen.

We can assimilate this to a swell at sea. As the swell approaches land, we get waves. In the shallows, we get choppiness and back currents.

The swell represents the weekly chart; waves are daily charts and the choppy shallows the five-minute chart.

Our current preference is the one-hour chart. As a full-time trader, this chart is mostly intraday; many bars meet the minimum scalp criteria and the market cycle, we think, is suitably defined.

Market cycle within a weekly chart
Market cycle, a weekly chart
Market cycle within a daily chart.
Market cycle, a daily chart
Market cycle within an hourly chart.
Market cycle, an hourly chart
Market cycle within a 5-minute chart.
Market cycle, a 5-minute chart

Time frame, which is best for intraday and short-term traders

Train with lower time frame charts, trade with higher.

We often like contrarian solutions. It says ‘doing something different from the crowd’.

About day trading they say: ‘do not’, ‘it’s risky’, ‘short-term volatility’, speculator’.

In the assimilation of information from a lower time-frame chart is the determination of probability possible?

Often it is not.

In a figure title in The Intelligent Investor Graham uses “the faster you run, the ‘behinder’ you get”.

Benjamin Graham, his time frame was value.
Benjamin Graham

He makes a point superbly by showing a bar chart that reflects the extremely patient keeping their gains and how the hyperactive made their broker rich, not themselves.

A dilemma, however, is that a technical trader dealing solely in the higher time frame will not trade often enough to gain the necessary skills to succeed.

The day trader is the tennis player that is on the court all the time. She attempts shots from every angle, overhead, volley and smashes.

The higher time frame trader, in this simile, takes a couple of swings a week or a month – are they match ready?

Traders with experience, skill and emotional stamina might profit in the lower time frame. For the rest of us, this area is our training ground for the higher charts.

What higher time frame to choose depends on our circumstances and personality. The 1-hour bars are the lowest so-called higher time frame that we ought to consider.

We favour the 1-hour, but we are happy to trade full-time intraday.

Others may prefer the daily bars.

For UK share traders using daily bars this is fine but other areas such as FX then New York close bars are required for correct price action.

Plan, Brief, Execute and Debrief

The quality of our trades depends on the quality of the decisions we make. We are not born with this ability, we learn it. Strategies guide and define our choices. Therefore, based on sound principles, a good plan is a vital step for us to produce right decisions.

Once we have a clear understanding of each part of our strategy, we can invent our way of recalling its sequence (as an ex-military pilot I like the plan, brief, execute and debrief order of things)

  1. Plan (News and Market Cycle)
  2. Brief (Backtest and Probability)
  3. Execution (Valid Entry)
  4. Debrief

Our ebook has many pages, but the simple block above helps collapse all our work into a process that allows, more often than not, to provide a profitable solution.

Day trading

As Jack Welch told us: “change before you have to.”

Beginners are attracted to day trading because, most of us when we start out, only consider one thing: risk.

With day trading we’re offered a low-risk, and the beginner takes this (usually unsuccessfully) with low probability entries.

The professional counters by taking high probability opportunities.

This often requires close attention for long periods followed by quick and decisive action.

Like all the best games, day trading is easy to learn but hard to master.

As Seth says, “if failure is not an option, neither is (the) success.”

A traders engine is….

What best helps us make money as a financial trader?

Is it:

  1. a fantastic strategy
  2. time on our hands to be able to trade
  3. enough money to trade with
  4. an environment without distraction
  5. the correct equipment and support software
  6. to be able to trade objectively, all the time

The list could go on. And of course, we could argue that all the above have a part to play, to some degree or other.

However, from our lessons, it is the final item that takes the biscuit.

To trade objectively (or in the zone, or from a ‘now’ moment perspective) is the engine of the whole process.

I have read ‘Trading in the Zone’ by the late Mark Douglas several times, and it was only the last read where, for me, the so-called ‘light’ came on.

I probably need to gain a certain level of traders experience before I was able to grasp what Douglas was telling me.

Risky

Readers will know that our chosen trade method is day trading a currency pairing.

People that are not familiar with how we go about our business will think ‘gosh, that’s risky’. And of course, to a large extent, they are right.

As with many disciplines that require a great deal of skill and practise (to merely achieve mediocrity), it comes across as risky because most don’t take the time and effort to learn.

Ironically a significant draw for us to day-trading is the control of risk.

Our e-book on the subject, release date within the first quarter of next year, shows, in some detail how this is possible.

Day trading, if done well and with practice, can provide a consistent daily or weekly return. So unlike other more traditional trade or investment methods.

With all worthwhile disciplines, it does not come to us overnight.

As Seth Godin said:

“The hard part is ‘steady.’

Anyone can go slow. It takes a (particular) kind of commitment to do it steadily, drip after drip until you get to where you’re going.”